Outcomes of atypical fibroxanthoma treated with Mohs surgery or wide local excision: A retrospective review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25251/t4e0x094Keywords:
atypical, excision, fibroxanthoma, immunosuppression, Mohs, outcomes, surgeryAbstract
Background: Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a rare cutaneous spindle cell neoplasm that typically affects elderly men on sun-exposed sites. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE) are common treatments, but comparative outcomes remain incompletely defined.
Objective: This study evaluated recurrence, metastasis, and surgical outcomes of AFX treated with MMS versus WLE, with emphasis on immunosuppression as a prognostic factor.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 23 patients with histologically confirmed AFX treated at a single academic center from 2010 to 2024. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were abstracted. Outcomes included local recurrence, metastasis, and defect size. Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for exploratory analysis.
Results: Fourteen patients underwent MMS and 9 underwent WLE. Recurrence rates were similar between groups (14% versus 11%). However, all recurrences and the single metastasis occurred in immunosuppressed patients, who had a higher recurrence rate than immunocompetent patients (67% versus 5%; P = .10). Postoperative defect size was smaller with MMS than with WLE (3.1 cm versus 5.5 cm; P < .001).
Conclusion: MMS provided effective tumor clearance with tissue conservation. Immunosuppression was strongly associated with adverse outcomes, underscoring the need for close surveillance in this high-risk subgroup.
References
1. Ang GC, Roenigk RK, Otley CC, Phillips PK, Weaver AL. More than 2 decades of treating atypical fibroxanthoma at Mayo Clinic: what have we learned from 91 patients? Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:765-772. PMID: 19389106
2. Tolkachjov SN, Kelley BF, Alahdab F, Erwin PJ, Brewer JD. Atypical fibroxanthoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery or excision. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:929-934.e6. PMID: 29981390
3. Meyer SN, Ren Y, Taylor S, Kiuru M, Eisen DB. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for the treatment of atypical fibroxanthoma: a retrospective cohort analysis. JAAD Int. 2023;12:174-176. PMID: 37520753
4. Davidson JS, Demsey D. Atypical fibroxanthoma: clinicopathologic determinants for recurrence and implications for surgical management. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:559-562. PMID: 22025342
5. Wylie J, Hampton N, Telfer MR, Clarke AM. Atypical fibroxanthoma: case series of 16 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48:466-468. PMID: 20129724
6. McCoppin HH, Christiansen D, Stasko T, et al. Clinical spectrum of atypical fibroxanthoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in solid organ transplant recipients: a collective experience. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:230-239. PMID: 22129349
7. Davis JL, Randle HW, Zalla MJ, Roenigk RK, Brodland DG. A comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and wide excision for the treatment of atypical fibroxanthoma. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23:105-110. PMID: 9107284
8. Seavolt M, McCall M. Atypical fibroxanthoma: review of the literature and summary of 13 patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:435-441. PMID: 16640694
9. Wollina U, Schönlebe J, Koch A, Haroske G. Atypical fibroxanthoma: a series of 25 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:943-946. PMID: 20158588
10. Huether MJ, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of spindle cell tumors of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:656-659. PMID: 11260542
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The author(s) have not made their research data available
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kevin Varghese, William Liakos, Atieh Jibbe (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
