Primary care engagement in hidradenitis suppurativa: Influence of disease severity, cardiometabolic risk, and access barriers

Authors

  • Charlotte McRae University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL Author
  • Sivani B. Reddy University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Dermatology, Birmingham, AL Author
  • Michael Anderson University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL Author
  • Laci Turner University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL Author
  • Tiffany Mayo University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Dermatology, Birmingham, AL Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25251/jc8msv36

Keywords:

access, barriers, cardiometabolic, delay, dermatology, hidradenitis suppurativa, hurley stage, primary care utilization

Abstract

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is linked to cardiometabolic disease (CMD), and guidelines recommend annual primary care visits. This study examined predictors of primary care utilization among patients with HS. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 307 patients with HS were analyzed. χ² tests, one-way analysis of variance, and multivariable logistic regression assessed associations among barriers to care, primary care provider (PCP) adherence, HS severity, and CMD presence. Results: Mean age was 39.4 years; 26.4% had Hurley stage III disease. Overall PCP adherence was 85.0% but lower in patients under 30 years (71.0%). CMD prevalence included hypertension (33.9%), type 2 diabetes (17.6%), and hypercholesterolemia (32.9%). Patients without CMD were 74.0% less likely to adhere to annual PCP visits (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.26; P = .001), and being uninsured reduced adherence by 82.0% (AOR, 0.18; P = .01). HS severity did not predict adherence, but Hurley stage III disease was associated with more PCP visits and independently predicted type 2 diabetes (AOR, 2.26; P = .02). Conclusion: Primary care engagement is influenced more by CMD and insurance than HS severity. Coordinated dermatology–primary care strategies may enhance preventive care, especially for younger patients without CMD.

References

1. Gold DA, Reeder VJ, Mahan MG, Hamzavi IH. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:699-703 [PMID: 24433875].

2. Serrano L, Ulschmid C, Szabo A, Roth G, Sokumbi O. Racial disparities of delay in diagnosis and dermatologic care for hidradenitis suppurativa. J Natl Med Assoc. 2022;114:613-616 [PMID: 36511276].

3. Howell CR, Zhang L, Mehta T, et al. Cardiometabolic Disease Staging and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event Prediction in 2 Prospective Cohorts. JACC Adv. 2024;3:100868 [PMID: 38765187].

4. Ergun T. Hidradenitis suppurativa and the metabolic syndrome. Clin Dermatol. 2018;36:41-47 [PMID: 29241751].

5. Vilanova I, Hernández J l., Mata C, et al. Insulin resistance in hidradenitis suppurativa: a case–control study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:820-824 [PMID: 29485215].

6. Ballard K, Shuman VL. Hidradenitis Suppurativa. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; May 6, 2024 [PMID: 30521288]

7. Garg A, Malviya N, Strunk A, et al. Comorbidity screening in hidradenitis suppurativa: Evidence-based recommendations from the US and Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:1092-1101 [PMID: 33493574].

8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Program. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2024. Accessed May 18, 2025. https://www.ahrq.gov/data/cahps.html

9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2023. Accessed May 18, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/index.htm

10. McClellan CB. Health care Utilization and Expenditures in Health Professional Shortage Areas. Med Care Res Rev. 2024;81:335-345 [PMID: 38486440].

11. Senthilnathan A, Kolli SS, Cardwell LA, Richardson I, Feldman SR, Pichardo RO. Validation of a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Self-Assessment Tool. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23:388-390 [PMID: 30897946]

12. Garg A, Neuren E, Cha D, et al. Evaluating patients’ unmet needs in hidradenitis suppurativa: Results from the Global Survey Of Impact and Healthcare Needs (VOICE) Project. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:366-376 [PMID: 31279015]

13. Kimball AB, Sundaram M, Gauthier G, et al. The Comorbidity Burden of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in the United States: A Claims Data Analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2018;8:557-569 [PMID: 30306395]

14. National Center for Health Statistics. Wellness Visit in Past 12 Months for Adults Aged 18 and Over, United States, 2019–2023. Published online 2023. Accessed April 15, 2025. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/NHISDataQueryTool/SHS_adult/index.html

15. Santo L, Kang K. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2019 National Summary Tables. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.); 2023. [DOI: 10.15620/cdc]

16. Reddy S, Strunk A, Jemec GBE, Garg A. Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and Cerebrovascular Accident in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:65-71 [PMID: 31721983]

17. Collier EK, Hsiao JL, Shi VY, Naik HB. Comprehensive approach to managing hidradenitis suppurativa patients. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:744-747 [PMID: 32250448]

18. Barnes LA, Shukla N, Paul M, et al. Patient Perspectives of Health System Barriers to Accessing Care for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159:510-517 [PMID: 37017984]

19. Barbieri JS, Mostaghimi A, Noe MH, Margolis DJ, Gelfand JM. Use of primary care services among patients with chronic skin disease seen by dermatologists. JAAD Int. 2021;2:31-36 [PMID: 34409351]

Downloads

Published

05/09/2026