Dermatomyositis: Dermoscopic features and a short review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25251/2wyrnt94Keywords:
dermatomyositis, dermoscopyAbstract
Background: Dermoscopy has demonstrated utility in several connective tissue diseases. However, in dermatomyositis, it has been poorly studied for both cutaneous and nailfold involvement. Methods: We report the cutaneous and nailfold dermoscopic features in 11 patients with dermatomyositis and compare them with previously published data. Results: Key cutaneous findings included linear vessels with a uniform distribution, white scales observed in all 11 patients, structureless white areas in 9 patients, brown globules in 9 patients, and mottled brown pigmentation in 8 patients. Nailfold dermoscopy revealed dilated capillaries and avascular areas in all patients, architectural disorganization in 10 patients, tortuous vessels in 8 patients, hemorrhages in 7 patients, and megacapillaries in 2 patients. Few studies have described dermoscopic features in dermatomyositis, some of them being isolated case reports with incomplete and heterogeneous clinical data. The largest published series included 29 patients and described polymorphic cutaneous vascular patterns, predominantly sparse white scales, as well as nailfold megacapillaries and dilated capillaries, without reporting follicular structures, shapes, or colors. Conclusion: Larger studies are needed to more precisely identify the distinctive dermoscopic signs of dermatomyositis and to evaluate the potential of dermoscopy as a prognostic tool for disease activity and progression.
References
1 Errichetti E, Zalaudek I, Kittler H, et al. Standardization of dermoscopic terminology and basic dermoscopic parameters to evaluate in general dermatology (non-neoplastic dermatoses): an expert consensus on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. Br J Dermatol. 2020;182:454–467. [PMID: 31077336].
2 Namiki T, Hashimoto T, Hanafusa T, Miura K, Yokozeki H. Case of dermatomyositis with Gottron papules and mechanic’s hand: dermoscopic features. J Dermatol. 2018;45:e19–e20. [PMID: 28971518].
3 Shekhar N, Rohit K, Kashif A, et al. Dermoscopy of dermatomyositis in dark skin. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12:e2022013. [PMID: 35223158].
4 Pozharashka J, Miteva L, Dourmishev L. Cutaneous manifestations and their corresponding dermoscopic features in patients with dermatomyositis. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12:e2022142. [PMID: 36159137].
5 Żychowska M, Reich A. Dermoscopy and trichoscopy in dermatomyositis—a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:375. [PMID: 35054069].
6 Bouattour E, Hammami H, Amal C, et al. Aspects dermoscopiques des signes cutanés au cours de la dermatomyosite. La Revue de Médecine Interne. 2024;45:A241. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2024.04.199].
7 Ghannem A, Zaouak A, Somai M, et al. Atteinte unguéale au cours de la dermatomyosite et apport de la dermoscopie. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2021;309. [PMID: 38426318].
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatima-Ezzahraa Zeroual, Layla Bendaoud, Maryam Aboudourib, Ouafa Hocar, Said Amal (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
