Advantages of teledermatology for incarcerated patients: A scoping review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25251/54pt8823Keywords:
correctional facilities, diversity, equity, inclusion, health disparities, health inequity, incarcerated patients, prison, teledermatologyReferences
1. U.S. Department of Justice. Prisoners in 2022 - Statistical Tables. NCJ 307149. October 15, 2024. Accessed November 4, 2024. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/prisoners-2022-statistical-tables
2. Delie AM, Bogale EK, Anagaw TF, et al. Global prevalence and predictors of scabies among prisoners: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1894. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19401-0. PMID:39010037
3. Mazmudar RS, Tripathi R, Bordeaux JS, Scott JF. Medical malpractice cases involving lack of access to dermatologists for incarcerated patients in the United States from 1982 to 2018. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019;311(10):837-840. doi:10.1007/s00403-019-01958-1. PMID:31321507
4. Sridhar S, Cornish R, Fazel S. The Costs of Healthcare in Prison and Custody: Systematic Review of Current Estimates and Proposed Guidelines for Future Reporting. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:716. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00716. PMID:30618885
5. California Legislative Analyst’s Office. Providing Constitutional and Cost-Effective Inmate Medical Care. 2012. Accessed November 10, 2024. https://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/crim/inmate-medical-care/inmate-medical-care-041912.pd
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data available upon request to authors
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ben W. Gratz, Bahar Lakeh, Ria Sandeep, Alan N. Moshell (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
