Advantages of teledermatology for incarcerated patients: A scoping review

Authors

  • Ben W. Gratz Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA Author
  • Bahar Lakeh Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA Author
  • Ria Sandeep Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA Author
  • Alan N. Moshell Department of Dermatology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25251/54pt8823

Keywords:

correctional facilities, diversity, equity, inclusion, health disparities, health inequity, incarcerated patients, prison, teledermatology

References

1. U.S. Department of Justice. Prisoners in 2022 - Statistical Tables. NCJ 307149. October 15, 2024. Accessed November 4, 2024. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/prisoners-2022-statistical-tables

2. Delie AM, Bogale EK, Anagaw TF, et al. Global prevalence and predictors of scabies among prisoners: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1894. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19401-0. PMID:39010037

3. Mazmudar RS, Tripathi R, Bordeaux JS, Scott JF. Medical malpractice cases involving lack of access to dermatologists for incarcerated patients in the United States from 1982 to 2018. Arch Dermatol Res. 2019;311(10):837-840. doi:10.1007/s00403-019-01958-1. PMID:31321507

4. Sridhar S, Cornish R, Fazel S. The Costs of Healthcare in Prison and Custody: Systematic Review of Current Estimates and Proposed Guidelines for Future Reporting. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:716. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00716. PMID:30618885

5. California Legislative Analyst’s Office. Providing Constitutional and Cost-Effective Inmate Medical Care. 2012. Accessed November 10, 2024. https://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2012/crim/inmate-medical-care/inmate-medical-care-041912.pd

Downloads

Published

03/02/2026

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request to authors